Minnesota Trappers Association
May 21 Final Update on Legislative Actions
This is sent on behalf of President Roggenkamp and myself:
Subject: 15845-0001: Final MN legislative issue
The Conference Committee on the Natural Resource Finance Omnibus bill could not agree on removing the wolf language. The House file is H.F. 2209 and the Senate file is S.F.2314.
Currently, Minnesota Statute Section 97B.645, Subdivision 9 provides for the DNR to allow a season for wolf, after providing for public comment, upon the delisting of the wolf under federal law. The proposed amendment in the house file would change the language to: “There is no open season for wolves.” This would mean that upon the delisting of the wolf federally, we would again have to go back to the legislature to again pass legislation allowing for a wolf season. We already did this and should not have to do so again.
Everyone should call, email and write the leadership in the House, Representatives Hortman and Daudt, and in the Senate, Senators Gazelka and Baak, and let them know you oppose changing current law with the wolf. Keep the comment respectful, short and to the point.
Basically something as follows:
I support the wolf species in Minnesota, but the wolf population in Minnesota has surpassed all previously set goals. In areas of the state the wolf population is above sustainable limits, and more than 1000 individual animals above all pre15845-0001: Final MN legislative issueviously set recovery goals. Without an open season, the MN DNR has no ability to managed the wolf, even in those areas of the state where the wolf is causing harm to other wildlife species including the moose and deer populations, and predation on livestock and pets. Every year both the state and federal government spend tens of thousands of dollar paying for depredation on livestock, and thousands more on government trappers. Hunters and trapper can provide this service at no cost to taxpayers if the DNR has the ability to have an open season. I oppose changing current law which allows the DNR to manage the wolf through an open season. Thank you.
This needs to be done quickly as the special session will likely occur this week Thursday (May 23). Thank you grl
Gary R. Leistico
May 7 Update on Legislative Actions
This email is sent on behalf of President Roggenkamp and I.Subject: 15845-0001: How to submit a formal comment on the delisting of wolves
The Conference Committee on the Natural Resource Finance Omnibus bill will be meeting soon. The leadership in the House and Senate have asked for the Committee reports to be completed by May 15. As in previous emails, the last remaining issue negative to trapping in the bill is the provision to undone the current statute which allows a wolf season in Minnesota when the wolf is delisted under federal law. I believe the Conference Committee will remove this provision (however, if you have not contacted the Committee members, still do so), but, if the wolf is not federally delisted, there will still never be a season for wolf in Minnesota. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is currently purposing to delist the wolf in the lower 48 states, and as part of the process must consider public comments. The time to submit a comment is on or before May 14, 2019. The comment can be submitted by email, and below is the link with instructions.
It is important that comments supporting the delisting are submitted. In part, just the fact that more positive than negative comments are submitted is important. We would ask you to submit a comment, ask others to do so, place this on the MTA website and on the new MTA Facebook page. Nothing fancy is required. State you support the delisting of the wolf in the entire lower 48 states to allow the states to manage the wolf. If that is all you write, most of the benefit of your comment is achieved. Additionally, you can state:
“I support the delisting of the wolf in the lower 48 states. For the 3 years Minnesota was allowed to manage the wolf (roughly 2012-2014), the state of Minnesota, as well as the others states where the wolf was delisted, managed the wolf conservatively and with no negative impacts to the wolf population. The delisting was beneficial to the natural and human environment in reducing the impacts from wolf predation on both big game populations and livestock.”
You can add your own thoughts and reasons as you see fit. I would advise against being outright negative about the wolf. The wolf is not bad, not managing the wolf is bad. If you have questions, please let us know. We will be filing a comment on behalf of the MTA as well.
Below please find the link to submit a formal comment in regards to the delisting of the gray wolf:
Here are the steps on how to submit a formal comment:
1. Click on the green submit a formal comment2. You can either type your comment in the provided space or you can attach your comment as a file and/or attach support documents to your comment. If you plan on attaching your comment and/or supporting documents please review the Attachment Requirements.3. Provide the following information requested below.4. Submit your comment.
Gary R. Leistico
May 2 - Update on Legislation with Contact Information.
REF: Bills SF 2314/HF2209
I see the governor has came out in support of prohibiting recreational harvest.
On Thu, May 2, 2019, 11:27 AM Gary Leistico wrote:
The Conferees for SF 2314/HF2209 have been named. They are Senators Ingebrigtsen, Ruud, Eichorn, Johnson and Tomassoni. The Reps are Hansen, Persell, Fischer, Becker-Finn and Nate Nelson. The provision in this bill that we object to is the one that would remove from current law any future wolf season. You should spread the word and start sending emails and phone calls to these Committee members and let them know that we oppose this provision and that it removes a valuable management tool and revenue stream from consideration in the event that the wolf is delisted. I will try to find out when they will meet but it could be any time beginning today so getting this campaign underway is going to be important.
Below is the contact information for the Committee members. Thanks. grl
Bill Ingebrigtsen 651-297-8063 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Carrie Ruud 651-296-4913 E-mail: email@example.com
Mark Johnson 651-296-5782 Use Mail Form
David J. Tomassoni 651-296-8017 Use Mail Form
Rick Hansen 651-296-6828 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
John Persell 651-296-5516 E-mail: email@example.com
Peter Fischer 651-296-5363 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Jamie Becker-Finn 651-296-7153 E-mail: email@example.comNathan Nelson 651-296-0518 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Gary R. Leistico
April 30th - UPDATE - from MTA Member’s Conversation from 'email clips'RE: Subject: 15845-0001: Amendments - TODAY -
There was one attempt to amend on the written permission, but this was withdrawn by Rep. Fisher when he failed to receive the 15 necessary votes to allow a roll call vote on the amendment. A very good outcome except the wolf amendment. In the next week or so, a conference committee will be selected from the House and Senate. Once this is done and published, we will need to contact the conference members to seek to remove the wolf language. This should be doable, but always a concern. Other associations within the outdoor community should help us on this. If you met with, called or emailed anyone in the legislature, if you are a MTA member, you are part of the outcome. Good job. For now. Gary Leistico
On Apr 30, 2019 9:18 PM, Steve Pahlen, wrote:
It was reported to me from Randy the House has passed the DNR omnibus bill, all the negative trapping language that would affect our tools and the way we operate have failed. It appears there wasn't even any attempts to amend the bill with negative language.
One amendment that was added and passed was to prohibit the harvest of wolves should they be delisted. That amendment wasn't in the Senate version. We will be following what happens closely. Hopefully, it gets removed in committee.
If anyone is interested in watching the debate on the wolf amendment they can here, it starts at the 1:09:00 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS82UdqhWIM
Thanks to all that made contact today.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:27 PM Randy Goldenman, wrote:
It's going to be a late night.
Subject: Re: 15845-0001: Amendments TODAY -
If anyone is bored they can watch the floor action today. The omnibus bill is last on the calendar of the day it appears, they are in recess until 2 pm
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:32 AM Roggenkamp, Todd wrote:
I did the same and have made several calls already and got a couple of the aides to pass along concerns.
On Apr 30, 2019, at 10:08 AM, Steve Pahlen, wrote:
All I sent emails to all of the aforementioned representatives. It seems that I got auto replies from several and I then sent emails to their legislative aides hoping they may get the message sometime today. I suggest all do the same. I know it's a PIA but it is what it is.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Roggenkamp, Todd, wrote:
To all -
I have sent this information to Tom Schmoll as well to post on Official MTA Facebook page.
On Apr 30, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Steve Pahlen, wrote:
Thanks for the heads up Gary,
Here is a list of names, with links, that Randy sent to me this morning and I've been sending to my contacts.
Randy Goldenmann has asked me to reach out to all I know about this bill. We anticipate the house to vote on it today, as it stands there is no negative trapping language that I am aware of is in it. We are expecting there could and will be a flurry of attempts to amend this bill today on the floor with negative language. We are asking you to contact at least the individuals listed below. I realize it's a long list but do what you can. Randy has spoken with these individuals in the past and they are very supportive of trapping yet we should contact them as their continued support will be an integral part in voting down any possible amendments that may come up. It will be a close vote, very close, some of these individuals will need to break away from party pressure.. Also wouldn't hurt to contact your local representative if they are not named below even if they are supportive, we'll need all the help we can get.
It is urgent that you attempt to contact them ASAP. Randy expects the floor vote to happen sometime today, most likely this evening but could be earlier. I realize this is short notice but that is how politics work.
John Persell 651-296-5516 E-mail: email@example.com
Julie Sandstede 651 296 0172 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Mike Sundin 651-296-4308 E-mail: email@example.com
Rep. Mary Murphy 651-296-2676 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Dave Lislegard651-296-0170 E-mail: email@example.com
Rep. Rob Ecklund (DFL) District: 03A 651-296-2190 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Jamie Becker-Finn Email: email@example.com
Rep. Jeff Brand 651-296-8634 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Hunter Cantrell 651-296-4212 E-mail: email@example.com
John (Jack) Considine Jr. 651-296-3248 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Kaohly Her 651-296-8799 E-mail: email@example.com
Rep. Jeanne Poppe 651-296-4193 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Duane Sauke 651-296-9249 E-mail: email@example.com
Rep. Brad Tabke 651-296-8872 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Rep. Dan Wolgamott 651-296-6612 E-mail: email@example.com
Rep. Tou Xiong 651-296-7807Rep. Patty Acomb 651-296-9934 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Here is a sample letter that I am going to send out:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------Honorable Representative Persell,My understanding is there will be a floor vote today on the DNR omnibus bill. I am a trapper in the great state of MN and I ask of your support and not vote in favor of any negative trapping amendments that may come up. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Respectfully,Steve Pahlen390 Healy Ave WPlummer MN 56748
4/24/2019 - Update from Legal Council:
Last night, the Senate Omnibus Natural Resource bill was heard on the Senate Floor. I watched the session live on the Senate web broadcast. It went late, but not as late as some years. No anti-trapping language was in the bill and no anti-trapping amendments were brought forward. This is a very good outcome. The House Omnibus Natural Resource bill has not been scheduled for a Floor session as of now, but could be at any time. Hopefully we get the same result in the House, but without a companion bill in the Senate, things are looking pretty good. Please forward this message. Thanks.
Gary R. Leistico
RINKE NOONANSuite 300, US Bank Plaza
P.O. Box 1497
St. Cloud, MN 56302
HF 2308 (Authored by Peter Fischer)
- SF 2359 (Senate Authors: Chris Eaton and Jason Isaacson)
HF 1327 (Authored by Peter Fischer)
HF880 ( Authored by Ami Wazlawik; Peggy Bennett; Jim Davnie; Jamie Becker-Finn; Carlos Mariani; Connie Bernardy; Mike Freiberg; Cheryl Youakim; Frank Hornstein; Kaohly Her; Robert Bierman )
HF 749 (Authored by Samantha Vang; Aisha Gomez; Jay Xiong; Rick Hansen; and Fue Lee)
- SF 1700 (Senate Author: Jason Isaacson)